tech
April 7, 2026
NYT union tells management its AI standards are "woefully inadequate"
A recent incident involving AI-driven plagiarism by a freelance book reviewer has pushed the guild to demand more clarity from around the paper's AI standards.

TL;DR
- The New York Times' editorial union argues that the paper's AI standards are "woefully inadequate" and too vague.
- A freelance book reviewer's use of AI for plagiarism has pushed the union to demand more clarity on AI standards.
- The union wants AI use to be excluded as an evaluation metric in performance reviews and for clearer disclosures on AI in journalism.
- The Times claims its latest contract proposal addresses the union's concerns about AI, as well as wages, healthcare, and remote work.
- The contract dispute is ongoing, with the previous three-year agreement having lapsed.
- AI has become a significant point of contention between newsroom unions and management across the industry.
Continue reading the original article