Lawyer sets new standard for abuse of AI; judge tosses case

February 7, 2026

TL;DR

A federal judge terminated a case because lawyer Steven Feldman repeatedly submitted filings drafted with AI that contained fake citations and "florid prose."
Feldman denied that AI drafted the filings, claiming he wrote them and used AI tools only to check citations, but the judge disbelieved his explanation.
The judge cited Feldman's lack of credibility, inconsistent responses, and failure to admit responsibility as reasons for the severe sanction.
The judge stressed that AI cannot replace traditional legal research and that attorneys have a professional obligation to verify all case citations.
The case involved a toy company suing merchants for selling stolen goods, and Feldman's client was accused of profiting from these thefts.
Feldman may also face sanctions for wasting court time and resources.

Continue reading
the original article