Story
October 5, 2026
Musk Backs Trump’s ‘Super Intelligence’ Push, but Skeptics Want Proof
Elon Musk says SpaceXAI will become SpaceXSI, aligning his AI business with President Trump’s preferred terminology. California is resisting the federal rebrand, while one skeptical observer notes Musk’s promises do not always become reality.
Trump set the terminology battle in motion on Sept. 29, ordering federal executive-branch agencies to replace “artificial intelligence” and “AI” with “super intelligence” and “SI” in official, non-statutory communications where legally permitted. The order argued that the government’s language should reflect the technology’s “transformative capabilities” and “limitless opportunities.”1
California moved the next day in the opposite direction. Gov. Gavin Newsom ordered state agencies to retain “Artificial Intelligence” and “AI,” declaring on X: “I just signed an executive order permanently declaring Artificial Intelligence ‘Artificial Intelligence;’ in California. You’re welcome, America.”1
Musk had already begun adopting the new label. On Oct. 2, he wrote that “Super Intelligence (fka AI) is now acing accounting tests,” according to reporting on the shift.1 Two days later, he took the branding further: “SpaceX is a super intelligence company,” Musk posted, adding, “No more AI. SI. It’s better.” Asked whether SpaceXAI would be renamed SpaceXSI, he answered: “Yes, we will make that change.”1
The move would place the former xAI business — acquired by SpaceX in February and responsible for the Grok chatbot and business tools — squarely inside Trump’s vocabulary campaign. Musk also amplified a post arguing that his interest in superintelligence predates the current “SI boom,” pointing to Nick Bostrom’s 2014 book and its acknowledgment of Musk’s discussions with the author.
2
But the announcement has met a familiar dose of doubt. One commentary distilled the reaction bluntly: “I’ll believe it when I see it,” arguing that Musk “says a lot of things.”3 For now, the rebrand is a declaration — and another test of whether Musk’s latest naming decision becomes a corporate reality.