Story
Nov 14, 2026
A second affair report turned Nvidia’s founder into its biggest liability.
Jensen Huang’s resignation followed reports of two affairs, one tied to U.S. security concerns. Nvidia named CFO Colette Kress interim CEO as questions over the company’s leadership, market outlook and board decisions mounted.
The crisis began with an affair that had implications far beyond Nvidia’s boardroom. On Nov. 8, Huang acknowledged being unfaithful, while U.S. intelligence officials reportedly suspected Alice Huang, a Chinese businesswoman with ties to a data-center company, of working for Beijing. Nvidia’s board hired outside counsel to investigate, but said it had “no reason to believe national security or company secrets were compromised.”1 China has denied the spy allegation.2
The first report threatened Huang’s position, but he initially appeared likely to survive the backlash. That changed Wednesday, when a second affair was reported—this time with a senior Nvidia executive who reported directly to him. The added allegations intensified scrutiny of Huang’s conduct and the board’s response.3
On Thursday, Nvidia announced Huang’s resignation, effective immediately, ending a 33-year run at the company he co-founded. CFO Colette Kress was named interim CEO as the board began searching for a permanent successor. Kress said Nvidia’s “strength has always come from its people” and pledged to build on the foundation Huang created.4 Board chair Harvey Jones said the leadership team and company operations would continue without interruption.5
The departure drew both gratitude and skepticism. Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas thanked Huang for 33 years of leadership and praised his support for founders.
6 Elon Musk, amplifying a criticism of the reports, questioned whether rumors had been presented as fact and said the episode raised “serious corporate governance issues.”
7
Investors, meanwhile, faced immediate uncertainty: Nvidia shares fell for a second day after the resignation, and HSBC downgraded the company to hold, citing the wait for a permanent succession plan.1