tech

As Wisconsin cities flee Flock, its shared camera network loses value

Perhaps it’s the local summer diet of deep-fried cheese curds, corn on the cob, and Spotted Cow, but Wisconsin residents have been feeling pretty dyspeptic about Flock’s automated license plate cameras.

As Wisconsin cities flee Flock, its shared camera network loses value

TL;DR

  • Several Wisconsin towns and cities have withdrawn from Flock contracts due to privacy and trust concerns.
  • The departure of cities diminishes the usefulness of Flock's shared camera network for remaining users.
  • Dane County, including Madison, cut funding and banned Flock cameras, impacting data sharing with 140 other agencies.
  • Cities like Monona, McFarland, Fitchburg, and the University of Wisconsin police force have reviewed or canceled their Flock contracts.
  • Concerns include the national search feature and how data is used by other areas.
  • Similar trends are observed in northeastern Wisconsin, with Oshkosh, Appleton, Grand Chute, and Kaukauna ending their Flock usage.
  • Some cities are switching to competing products, such as Axon, citing better privacy features.
  • Public resistance has been a significant factor in these decisions, leading Flock to implement new audit controls and reduce data retention periods.
  • The 'network effect' has worked in reverse, as customer departures reduce the value of the service.