Story
September 23, 2026

YouTube Hands Viewers More Say Over What Its Algorithm Serves

YouTube is pitching custom feeds as a way to make its enormous catalogue easier to navigate, while giving viewers more control over recommendations without asking them to abandon the platform’s core homepage feed.

YouTube’s latest effort to tame its own scale began in May, when it introduced a feature allowing people to generate a video feed from prompts describing their interests, moods or favourite subjects. The company is now widening that experiment: users will be able to create and save multiple personalised feeds on their home screens, with US availability on web, mobile and TV promised “soon.”

The expansion was announced Wednesday as Custom Feeds, a prompt-based tool powered by Google’s Gemini model. Rather than accept one broad stream of recommendations, viewers can describe exactly what they want — including what to prioritise or leave out — and receive a dedicated tab at the top of the YouTube homepage. Suggested uses range from podcasts for a 30-minute train journey to “relaxing commentary videos to unwind with.”

For YouTube, the pitch is discovery, not a revolt against the algorithm. Emily Moxley, the company’s VP of Product Management for Viewer AI, pointed to the sheer volume confronting users: “There’s over 20 billion videos in the YouTube corpus, so you’re always one search away from a treasure trove of topics.” Custom feeds are meant to make those searches more purposeful, allowing viewers to switch among contexts instead of retraining a single catch-all recommendation stream.

That places YouTube alongside Bluesky, Threads, Instagram, X and Spotify, all of which have experimented with giving users more influence over how feeds are assembled. But YouTube is drawing a firm boundary: its main recommendation feed will not be replaced. The new tabs are an optional shortcut into narrower, user-defined viewing modes.

Support for creating multiple feeds is due to begin rolling out on web and mobile next month, according to YouTube. The result is more choice at the margins — not full control of the machine running the homepage.